Pensaments of an Anthropological Patzer

2005 San Francisco Collaborative Food System Assessment

3 December 2005, 21:08

This is not one of the aforepromised heavy posts, but will likely be of interest to some of the San Franciscans who read this blog. I’ve been getting involved in some political/social volunteer work that I haven’t mentioned, really, in this blog as I haven’t wanted others I’m working with to worry about whether or not I’ll write about any particular event. However, I don’t think the below could be considered objectionable.

On Wednesday, I had the very unusual experience of sitting across the table from Leo O’Farrell at a meeting of the San Francisco Food Security Task Force. Unusual, as Leo is the director of Food Stamps programs in San Francisco, and I was scheduled to interview for Food Stamps the following day, and had only come to this meeting on the invitation of an activist with whom I frequently volunteer. It took me a long time to get up the courage to walk down to the Food Stamps office and apply. Though I was making very little money for important work that I couldn’t just abandon, I didn’t feel like I deserved Food Stamps — I had grown up middle class and had gone to college — I ought to be doing better for myself. And along with guilt, also pride: I could take care of myself; I didn’t need help. Food Stamps are, in addition, a very public kind of poverty. I could see myself paying for bulk items at Rainbow Grocery, where I know nobody, but how would I feel admitting poverty in every purchase from the vendors at the farmers’ market whom I see twice weekly, and half of whom I know by name? (More disturbingly, I’d like to think that I’m a person who does not pass economic judgement, but if I think these things about myself, is it really possible that these thoughts do not influence my dealings with others?)

Though I qualified for Food Stamps, I also managed to qualify, shortly after my initial application at the Food Stamps office, for a job, and I ended up cancelling my Food Stamps interview. I was not — am not — alone in avoiding aid of which I could have taken advantage. In fact, like me, 64% of those qualifying for nutritional aid in this city never enrol in the program. This was one of many, many interesting morsels about food in San Francisco that Leo and I were treated to through a report covered at the Food Security Task Force meeting. The San Francisco Food Alliance has released the 2005 San Francisco Collaborative Food System Assessment (PDF, 3.3 MB) — a broad report which covers every aspect of the food system (production, distribution, consumption, and recycling) from school gardens to post-consumption compost. If you live in San Francisco, the report is worth reading from cover to cover — it’s only eighty pages, and there are some awesome graphical representations of the city’s food system. A lot of the data merits greater political and social commentary, but the accessibility of the data alone makes this report a great contribution.

It’s difficult to exaggerate how important food and shelter are to social relations in this city. If you’re a San Franciscan who cares about San Francisco (or an elsewherian who wants to see what a broad overview of a city’s food system might look like), the Collaborative Food System Assessment is decidedly worth checking out.

Re-Visiting and Re-Vising Experience After the Fact

2 December 2005, 09:24

I’ve got two heavy interrelated posts coming up, but they require a little prep, and I had a flashback, the other morning, that got me to thinking.

My first week in the field, my friend Kwadwo (name changed) invited me to a funeral in Yaase — the town a few kilometres up the Lake Road of which Adwafo might have been considered a colony. I was new to town, didn’t really know what I was doing, and wanted to know everything. So, I borrowed a funerary toga, grabbed my camera, and tucked my notebook and pen into my boxers (togas have no pockets!). Kwadwo waved down a pick-up truck (not a hard thing to do when you’ve got a white guy in tow), and we were off.

Funerals are carnivalesque bacchanals in Asante. I won’t get into the details (see pp. 78-81 of my thesis for a description of one funeral; it’s not the best research on Asante funerals, but it’s the only piece I know of on-line), but suffice it to say that rare is the person of either sex who does not go home drunk or hung-over. It’s like a toga party in Bizarro Delta House. Kwadwo was theoretically a teetotaller, and I hadn’t yet learned the bottle, so we took it easy — a couple of calabashes of corn beer mixed with Coca-Cola (petoo alone tastes like piss, so it’s good to temper it with high fructose corn syrup). We were both a little tipsy heading up the road to catch a trɔtrɔ or taxi back to Adwafo, and my bladder hadn’t taken easily to the petoo. ‘Charlie… Ɛhia sɛ megu nsuo… Mekɔ aba.’ ‘Dude… I must pour water… I’ll be right back.’ I took a few steps into the bush, did my business, and returned. Kwadwo: ‘You know what we call that, right?’ I nodded, and repeated the phrase I’d picked up from some book or other: ‘Gu nsuo.’ ‘Well, yeah, but there’s also another word.’ I shrugged. ‘We call it dwense.’
Read the rest of this entry »

To all my people in DC

1 December 2005, 12:33

Hope you’re having fun at the AAA Annual Meeting!

David Price at Counterpoint: How US Anthropologists Planned “Race-Specific” Weapons Against the Japanese

26 November 2005, 23:50

I haven’t had time to read this yet, but neither have I seen it mentioned anywhere else in the anthropologosphere, and it struck me as the sort of thing others out there might be interested in. Before PRISP, there was… well, there was a lot of stuff: administrative assistance for colonial governments, spying in times of war, and now, apparently, race-specific weaponry. Say what? Let David Price (author of Threatening Anthropology) tell you all about ‘How US Anthropoligists [sic] Planned “Race-Specific” Weapons Against the Japanese’ over at Counterpunch.
Read the rest of this entry »

Employed!

26 November 2005, 18:30

Whew.

At the end of our streets…

23 November 2005, 10:41

I got sick in India — most every American does. Upon return to the United States, I had a falling out with the family physician, and in the five years following I did not see a doctor about this lingering illness. This past September, my friend Emily convinced me to go to the Haight Ashbury Free Medical Clinic on Haight and Clayton. I went, was diagnosed, and received a prescription… A prescription that involved no cardiovascular exercise until my condition cleared up.
Read the rest of this entry »

Does anyone else find the NY Times interview with Jean Baudrillard a little ironic?

23 November 2005, 09:35

It’s a simulacrum of a dialogue in a simulation of journalism. I’m trying to decide my favourite part: It might be ‘So you don’t think that the U.S. invaded Iraq to spread freedom?’ See, ’cause, I totally thought Baudrillard would think that…

For those of you who don’t read high-falutin’ French logorrhoea (after all, as Baudrillard tells us, ‘It [is] like the Statue of Liberty. Nobody needs French theory…’), the basic premise of Baudrillard’s later work is that modern media and culture are produced not in reaction to reality, but in reaction to simulations of reality, thus leaving us all adrift in a hyperreality: If you get why Good Charlotte and ANSWER protests are not really rebellious, but why they will continue to appear so, and why mainstream media will continue to be shocked — just shocked — by Eminem’s lyrics while continuing to promote his music and image, then you get what Baudrillard’s about.

There’s more to his work than that, but that’s the core point of the man’s post-Marxist work (I’ve read none of his Marxist stuff), and is what Solomon is referring to when she asks him about simulation and simulacra. As I’m sure the Times will make you pay for it soon enough, I’ve included the interview below:
Read the rest of this entry »

Unemployed again… Bah!

22 November 2005, 12:43

I generally try to avoid talking about my personal life unless I can somehow relate it to culture or theory, or unless I’m writing about things done alone, and can omit personal information about friends and acquaintances. I’ve been reading Hegel and Marx, lately, and my brain wants me to relate the following to labour, but my heart’s just not feeling it:

I got fired, last week. Read the rest of this entry »

Interview with David Graeber at Toward Freedom

21 November 2005, 18:02

Never before been to Toward Freedom, but they’re running an interview with David Graeber, today. For those of you not in the know, David Graeber is an anarchist anthropologist who’s been denied tenure at Yale. Savage Minds did a piece on Graeber back in May. There’s been little news on his case since that time.
Read the rest of this entry »

Outlook India: Anthropologist B. K. Roy Burman Undertakes Death Fast in Assam

21 November 2005, 16:40

Roy launches fast unto death against violence in Assam

[Sunday, November 20, 2005 05:56:00 pmPTI]

DIPHU (ASSAM): Noted anthropologist B K Roy Burman on Sunday launched a fast unto death in Assam’s strife-torn Karbi Anglong district where 14 houses of Dimasa tribals were torched on Saturday.

Roy Burman, who is on a peace mission to the ethnic violence-affected district, had visited Lower Mohan Dijirwa three days ago and held peace meetings with both Karbi and Dimasa tribes.

Burman told reporters that Saturday’s incident had “hurt his feelings” and he had decided to launch the fast unto death to protest against the continuing violence.

Meanwhile, the situation in the area was tense but under control with no untoward incident reported on Sunday.

Ethnic feuds erupted in Karbi Anglong on September 26 between Karbis and Dimasa tribals which have so far claimed more than 90 lives.

Read the rest of this entry »