http://www.pathawi.net/b-log/2005/11/26/david-price-at-counterpoint-how-us-anthropologists-planned-race-specific-weapons-against-the-japanese/ Pensaments of an Anthropological Patzer Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:42:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.pathawi.net/b-log/2005/11/26/david-price-at-counterpoint-how-us-anthropologists-planned-race-specific-weapons-against-the-japanese/#comment-100 NotSoMuch Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:27:31 +0000 http://www.pathawi.net/b-log/2005/11/26/david-price-at-counterpoint-how-us-anthropologists-planned-race-specific-weapons-against-the-japanese/#comment-100 Good entry. One of the threads weaving its way through your blog is your contemplation of the ethics of matters arising in your field. This is important in my field (psychology). In fact, the crossovers and parallels are significant in something like the above. We have to consider the ethics. We have to. Have to. People cannot go ahead and do something just because it can be done. Should it be done? is always one of the questions that must be asked. We have to hold others to their ethical imperatives, too, even if they try to refuse to do that for themselves or do something less mindful than "refuse" just skip it because that is the shortest distance between 2 points. Good entry.
One of the threads weaving its way through your blog is your contemplation of the ethics of matters arising in your field.
This is important in my field (psychology). In fact, the crossovers and parallels are significant in something like the above.
We have to consider the ethics. We have to. Have to.
People cannot go ahead and do something just because it can be done. Should it be done? is always one of the questions that must be asked.
We have to hold others to their ethical imperatives, too, even if they try to refuse to do that for themselves or do something less mindful than “refuse” just skip it because that is the shortest distance between 2 points.

]]>